stupidly large signatures

steptoe · Post by **steptoe** » Sun Oct 16, 2011 8:20 am

might not be getting enough unbroken sleep

revmax · Post by **revmax** » Sun Oct 16, 2011 10:14 am

one more side to go steptoe

my sig picture is relevant

RSR 555 · Post by **RSR 555** » Sun Oct 16, 2011 10:28 am

steptoe wrote:might not be getting enough unbroken sleep

So this means your getting too much normal sleep?? I wish I had that problem

tony · Post by **tony** » Sun Oct 16, 2011 10:12 pm

it annoys me because it uses up my download allowance. so i turn the images off.

steptoe · Post by **steptoe** » Mon Oct 17, 2011 7:35 am

I used to have same problem Tony, finally had to go for an upgrade if my ISP can do that at all, no , call it an increase in allowance and cost. I used to surf the googled sites based on their size quoted - something no longer provided, used to turn images off to save as well, ended up going over the limits and paying more in penalties. I only turn pics off when circumstances force me to GSM reception.

Smokey · Post by **Smokey** » Thu Oct 20, 2011 10:19 am

I have had a sig for a while but it never seems to work. Ok so mine is too big too

So do we have a "correct size"

I'll have to get out and take more pics so I have something suitable

RSR 555 · Post by **RSR 555** » Mon Oct 24, 2011 4:54 pm

Most of these sigs use less than 50kbs.. so you wouldn't even see a drop in you useage

YouTube · Post by **El_Freddo** » Thu Oct 27, 2011 2:05 pm

Alex wrote:I know I don't have the smallest signature around but I think some of you are getting a little out of control with multicoloured large distracting fonts and over the top sized pictures.

Your sig size is what I would deem acceptable Alex, I've always done the same with mine and not hand any complaints until the last 4wd trip - my sig fits the page on my computer, but on others it doesn't, so I've uploaded it again for a 12 inch monitor and it should be good for all now.

Alex wrote:Large signatures make navigation difficult with and mobile device

Fair call, but from what I remember the internet was designed for computers to access, not mobiles. On this note I'm not bending for mobile access and I'll stick with my computer.

Cheers

Bennie

NachaLuva · Post by **NachaLuva** » Thu Oct 27, 2011 6:16 pm

Yeah fits much better now

El_Freddo wrote:Fair call, but from what I remember the internet was designed for computers to access, not mobiles. On this note I'm not bending for mobile access and I'll stick with my computer.

Cheers

Bennie

I dunno, all this new fangled technology!

Brumby Kid · Post by **Brumby Kid** » Thu Oct 27, 2011 7:48 pm

Alex will probly want us to make them bigger soon, if he gets an ipad for his birthday today.
Hahahahahahaha
Happy Birthday Alex

spike · Post by **spike** » Thu Oct 27, 2011 8:14 pm

the height of the sigs dont really bother me, its the width that does.
it makes the browser give me a slide bar and to text to follow.

NachaLuva · Post by **NachaLuva** » Fri Oct 28, 2011 1:48 pm

spike wrote:the height of the sigs dont really bother me, its the width that does.
it makes the browser give me a slide bar and to text to follow.

yep thats what annoys me too...

Brumby Kid wrote:Alex will probly want us to make them bigger soon, if he gets an ipad for his birthday today.
Hahahahahahaha
Happy Birthday Alex

lol

Post by **Alex** » Fri Oct 28, 2011 2:32 pm

Im not only me that gets frustrated with it. I think the most annoying sigs have been rectified now anyways.

Ipads are the biggest pieces of shit. I browse with my Motorola XOOM tablet. Lol

Alex