Page 1 of 2
Maths question
Posted: Fri Nov 11, 2011 9:50 am
by Alex
40+40x0+1 = ?
been arguing with some people on facebook for days about the answer.
what do you reckon?
Posted: Fri Nov 11, 2011 9:56 am
by FROG
40 + 40 = 80
80 x 0 = 0
0 + 1 = 1
I think !!!!
Posted: Fri Nov 11, 2011 10:14 am
by Alex
dont forget about a thing called BIMDAS
Posted: Fri Nov 11, 2011 10:17 am
by TOONGA
where are the ( ) to define the sum?
(40+40) x 0 +1 =
40+40 x (0 +1) =
(40+40) x (0 +1) =
40+ (40 x 0) +1 =
Four different ways for the same sum / equation work that out first.
as a rule
stalkbook sucks
so does this
site
TOONGA
Posted: Fri Nov 11, 2011 10:18 am
by Alex
there are no brackets intentionally Jules..otherwise itd be too obvious
Posted: Fri Nov 11, 2011 10:32 am
by purp
My moneys on 41.
Posted: Fri Nov 11, 2011 10:42 am
by TOONGA
Alex wrote:there are no brackets intentionally Jules..otherwise itd be too obvious
notice I didn't answer any of the sums / equations
my money is on the answer being 1 by the way.
TOONGA
Posted: Fri Nov 11, 2011 10:59 am
by Brumby Kid
Yeah its 1. Or if you use BEDMAS then its 41. Mmmmmm
I will ask my maths teacher when i next have maths whether we should use BEDMAS or not. BTW BEDMAS
Brackets, exponants, division, multiplication, addition, subtraction.
Cheers
Cam
Posted: Fri Nov 11, 2011 11:02 am
by D3V1L
its 41. multipication before addition when brackets are not present so ends up being
40 + (40 x 0) + 1
which = 41
davo

Posted: Fri Nov 11, 2011 11:08 am
by Alex
BIMDAS...there are afew different versions but everyone knows BIMDAS(well should know)
Brackets
Indices
Multiplication
Division
Addition
Subtraction
Posted: Fri Nov 11, 2011 11:16 am
by Brumby91
Posted: Fri Nov 11, 2011 1:37 pm
by ashleyn
Yep 41 it is for mine
Posted: Fri Nov 11, 2011 3:40 pm
by woody.t
40+40x0+1 = ?, i've done a few years of calculus study and the obvious methodology would be to follow bimdas yielding a solution of 41, in saying that i've watched math lectures prove 1+1 = 0 so there is some chance of some dude coming up with a logic based solution giving a different solution, i doubt it but it's plausible
Posted: Fri Nov 11, 2011 4:13 pm
by revmax
would you believe I done 3U Maths some 22 years ago and I am not sure of the answer to this question. Maybe I have to much fun since school.
Posted: Fri Nov 11, 2011 4:26 pm
by Alex
revmax wrote:would you believe I done 3U Maths some 22 years ago and I am not sure of the answer to this question. Maybe I have to much fun since school.
haha oh mate, i think the answer is in your sig pic

Posted: Fri Nov 11, 2011 5:13 pm
by Silverbullet
Here's a suggestion; who cares?
It really isn't important

Posted: Fri Nov 11, 2011 5:19 pm
by TOONGA
I have proof that
1+1=0
1+1=1+√1=1+√(-1)(-1) != 1+√(-1)*√(-1)=1+i*i=1+(-1)=0
reading about it made my eyes bleed and summoned
El Chupacabras.
TOONGA
Posted: Fri Nov 11, 2011 5:21 pm
by Gannon
Yeah I reckon 41 as well
Posted: Fri Nov 11, 2011 7:05 pm
by MTB92
hehe, you guys help me with the car and i will help you with the maths
it is 41.
multiplication takes priority over addition (at least thats the best way i can think to explain it, and for simple stuff like that you can base it off bimdas) unless the brackets indicate otherwise.
any off you guys have a scientific or graphics calculator (actually your computer will have one too)? type it into that as it is written and it will tell you
nice toonga, but for 1+√(-1)(-1) != 1+√(-1)*√(-1) LHS does not equal RHS. my calc teacher in yr 12 had a whole heap like this he used to make us find the fualts in.
Posted: Fri Nov 11, 2011 8:54 pm
by GOD
Silverbullet wrote:Here's a suggestion; who cares?
It really isn't important


shame on you. Good maths is beautiful: e^(i*pi)+1=0.
Jules, there are many ways to do that, and you know they're all wrong.
42. Just because.
Dane.