The Brumbyrunner Project
Moderator: brumbyrunner
- Captain Obvious
- General Member
- Posts: 1292
- Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2005 10:00 am
- Location: maryborough
Awesome!!!!!!
[SIGPIC]http://www.ausubaru.com/forum/image.php ... 1468060434[/SIGPIC]
The 4x4: 2004 Nissan Navara d22 ZD30 dual cab.
The Wifes car: 2005 SG9 Facelift forester 2.5l auto XS
The 4x4: 2004 Nissan Navara d22 ZD30 dual cab.
The Wifes car: 2005 SG9 Facelift forester 2.5l auto XS
- brumbyrunner
- General Member
- Posts: 1743
- Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 10:00 am
- Location: SEQ
- vincentvega
- Senior Member
- Posts: 2446
- Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2005 10:00 am
- Location: Brisvegas
- Contact:
there is a good shot of the ute here if you scroll across a bit.
http://www.finkedesertrace.com.au/page- ... hotos.html
http://www.finkedesertrace.com.au/page- ... hotos.html

brumbyrunner wrote:And just to clarify the real 4WD thing, Subarus are an unreal 4WD.
- brumbyrunner
- General Member
- Posts: 1743
- Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 10:00 am
- Location: SEQ
- Brumby Boy
- Junior Member
- Posts: 594
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2005 10:00 am
- Location: Townsville, Queensland, Australia
Just spotted the ute on head to the hills on one HD, only just through all the dust behind those buggies but it was definitely the brumby... pity there was no more footage
Long live the 1990 Subaru Brumby 2" lifted and soon to be mig locked
RIP 1992 Brumby
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2507954
http://www.myspace.com/brumby_boy
few self-respecting ricers would spend the time to modify a Daewoo.

RIP 1992 Brumby
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2507954
http://www.myspace.com/brumby_boy
few self-respecting ricers would spend the time to modify a Daewoo.

- brumbyrunner
- General Member
- Posts: 1743
- Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 10:00 am
- Location: SEQ
Here's some pics of the damage and repairs we sustained at the Finke.
Clean break on a 25 spline shaft.

Side-swiped by a buggy

Engine crossmember. Tig welds show where the hole for the steering rack started cracking.

Underneath engine crossmember. We welded both sides of all the cracks where possible and some makeshift reinforcing.

Clean break on a 25 spline shaft.

Side-swiped by a buggy

Engine crossmember. Tig welds show where the hole for the steering rack started cracking.

Underneath engine crossmember. We welded both sides of all the cracks where possible and some makeshift reinforcing.

Settlement Creek Racing
- brumbyrunner
- General Member
- Posts: 1743
- Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 10:00 am
- Location: SEQ
- Outback bloke
- Senior Member
- Posts: 2103
- Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2005 10:00 am
- Location: Morayfield - Queensland
- Contact:
- vincentvega
- Senior Member
- Posts: 2446
- Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2005 10:00 am
- Location: Brisvegas
- Contact:
- brumbyrunner
- General Member
- Posts: 1743
- Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 10:00 am
- Location: SEQ
No, but there wasn't much to see. It looked like someone had smacked it with the corner of a cold chisel.Outback bloke wrote:Did you get any pics of the fuel tank before you sent it off?
Maybe Dane, hard to know. Could have just been a weak shaft. If it happens again I'll do something about it. I doubt I'd break an Albins axleshaft.vincentvega wrote:Do you think the Goodyear muddies are to blame for the shaft breakage?
Maybe you need to find some less aggressive tyres for dry conditions. It's a real shame you can't get those rally tyres anymore
With the different format at Gundy I'm happier to run the old rally tyres knowing I can get more spares.
The bar has risen and the current std for rally-raid or cross-country rally is a 32" tyre of which there is a good selection. I don't think my running gear or drivetrain would stand up to that in it's current shape. I need to get the 6 speed and porshe CVs happening first.
Settlement Creek Racing
Wow that's some hefty damage! Dispite the cost and inconvinience I guess it must be good to learn where the weak points are. Do you have any upgrades in mind for preventing these breakages in the future or are you happy with the weak points where they are rather than transferring them elsewhere (like to the body itself).
EZ30 L series - Monsterwagon
https://www.ausubaru.com.au/viewtopic.php?f=71&t=26163
https://www.ausubaru.com.au/viewtopic.php?f=71&t=26163
- brumbyrunner
- General Member
- Posts: 1743
- Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 10:00 am
- Location: SEQ
- vincentvega
- Senior Member
- Posts: 2446
- Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2005 10:00 am
- Location: Brisvegas
- Contact:
- brumbyrunner
- General Member
- Posts: 1743
- Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 10:00 am
- Location: SEQ
- Outback bloke
- Senior Member
- Posts: 2103
- Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2005 10:00 am
- Location: Morayfield - Queensland
- Contact:
I really think that shaft breakage is just some thing that will come with racing. Even the bigger budget race cars are breaking shafts. I would say using a better quality one is going to eliminate some of the breakage which is good for finishing races. What is bad though is the extra strain is obviously being put some where.
I feel that the shaft didn't break from a HP or traction thing but it was fatigued when the radius rod was pushed right back. With the travel you have and the wheel being further back the shaft would have been beyong it's workable limit.
Surely the BFG's, or a mud pattern tyre, is better than the closed rally tyres. Look at all the world class rally teams for example, when they are running first on the track they use a more aggressive tread. When the the track has been swept by front runners they will use less aggressive tyres.
Put this in to offroad racing and the front runners actually get the swept track. It is the poor bloke running down the back of the pack that is getting the chewed up track.
Maybe the compound of your tyres is not quite right but I feel the tread is.
Sure it is burnt to the ground but you don't get to be a front runner if you use the wrong tyres. They aren't even the drive wheels.

I feel that the shaft didn't break from a HP or traction thing but it was fatigued when the radius rod was pushed right back. With the travel you have and the wheel being further back the shaft would have been beyong it's workable limit.
Surely the BFG's, or a mud pattern tyre, is better than the closed rally tyres. Look at all the world class rally teams for example, when they are running first on the track they use a more aggressive tread. When the the track has been swept by front runners they will use less aggressive tyres.
Put this in to offroad racing and the front runners actually get the swept track. It is the poor bloke running down the back of the pack that is getting the chewed up track.
Maybe the compound of your tyres is not quite right but I feel the tread is.
Sure it is burnt to the ground but you don't get to be a front runner if you use the wrong tyres. They aren't even the drive wheels.

- brumbyrunner
- General Member
- Posts: 1743
- Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 10:00 am
- Location: SEQ
Speaking of extra strain on things, the drivers side ball joint has play in it again whereas the pass side one is still okay. This was a genuine new one we put in after Prologue so it's done 480km.
As far as tyres go, I reckon the MTR is a good compromise between a mud-terrain and an all-terrain. They are nice and soft and bag out well for a 10 ply tyre. The obsolete Bridestone rally tyres handle better though. I'm just worried about their age.
On another note, I spent some time under the car this evening, checking out the approach angle. What would be the chance of relocating the sump/oil pan with a dry sump? Then build a new exhaust crossover pipe that runs directly between the exhaust ports.It would be a shorter path, running right through where the sump is now. That should allow a new bash-guard to tuck up an inch or two higher and move the front fold point back about 4 or 5". Whatcha reckon?
As far as tyres go, I reckon the MTR is a good compromise between a mud-terrain and an all-terrain. They are nice and soft and bag out well for a 10 ply tyre. The obsolete Bridestone rally tyres handle better though. I'm just worried about their age.
On another note, I spent some time under the car this evening, checking out the approach angle. What would be the chance of relocating the sump/oil pan with a dry sump? Then build a new exhaust crossover pipe that runs directly between the exhaust ports.It would be a shorter path, running right through where the sump is now. That should allow a new bash-guard to tuck up an inch or two higher and move the front fold point back about 4 or 5". Whatcha reckon?
Settlement Creek Racing
- Outback bloke
- Senior Member
- Posts: 2103
- Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2005 10:00 am
- Location: Morayfield - Queensland
- Contact:
- vincentvega
- Senior Member
- Posts: 2446
- Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2005 10:00 am
- Location: Brisvegas
- Contact:
I only commented on the tyres because i have been doing a lot of reading / youtubing lately (getting the bug again with WRC in a few weeks!) and a lot of the big boys talk about running less aggressive tyres in the dry to ease the shock loading on the drive train.
Hopefully the shaft did just break because the joint was overextended when the front end took that hit. It seems a big coincidence that the shaft on that side broke..
Hopefully the shaft did just break because the joint was overextended when the front end took that hit. It seems a big coincidence that the shaft on that side broke..

brumbyrunner wrote:And just to clarify the real 4WD thing, Subarus are an unreal 4WD.
- Outback bloke
- Senior Member
- Posts: 2103
- Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2005 10:00 am
- Location: Morayfield - Queensland
- Contact:
Yeah, the shaft, the ball joint and the cross member all on the same side that the impact was.
I agree with the using as least aggressive tyre as possible too. I just think that where BR is running in the field at the moment he has to use the tyres that he has.
I have already told him there is nothing to hit when you are in the air so he has to stay airborne longer.
I agree with the using as least aggressive tyre as possible too. I just think that where BR is running in the field at the moment he has to use the tyres that he has.
I have already told him there is nothing to hit when you are in the air so he has to stay airborne longer.
