forester or outback

General Subaru Talk - Media / News / Stories ...
Post Reply
User avatar
tony
Junior Member
Posts: 266
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 11:00 pm
Location: wa

forester or outback

Post by tony » Sat May 21, 2016 12:33 am

Looking at buying one or the other. how do they compare, what are the strengths and weaknesses,which would be best for a touring car, must be automatic.

thanks

User avatar
Phizinza
General Member
Posts: 1444
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 10:00 am
Location: SA
Contact:

Post by Phizinza » Sat May 21, 2016 10:00 pm

Outback has better space inside the car, especially the boot. Forester has much better ground clearance (body ground clearance I should say).

Both ride and handle similar, although I think the Forester is a bit stiffer, sportier.
Owned - 89 Brumby, 83 Wagon, 83 Leone 4WD Sedan, 83 Touring Wagon, 99 Outback
Own - 87 Brumby, 93 Liberty, 09 Forester
Offroading Subarus Facebook Page


User avatar
julian
Junior Member
Posts: 407
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 10:00 am
Location: Orange NSW

Post by julian » Wed Jun 15, 2016 3:33 pm

Do you have a budget or buying new?
By touring do you mean long uninterrupted drives on bitumen, a bit of graded dirt, or the need for sand and mud work?
Do you have kids that will join you?
Julian

2004 Outback H6
2004 Forester XS

Organ donation saves lives

User avatar
pezimm
Junior Member
Posts: 463
Joined: Sun Jun 07, 2009 4:21 pm
Location: VIC

Post by pezimm » Sat Jun 18, 2016 3:11 pm

I'm a Forester fan! It's pretty decent for touring provided you're travelling solo or as a couple...

My view is that Foresters are better off road vehicles - at least the starting point is. But if you're doing purely bitumen kilometres and want plush comfort, then the Outback is the one for you!
Image

GONE :( - Forester XT Auto - MY07 with all the goodies
Now occasionally driving a Ford barge...

User avatar
julian
Junior Member
Posts: 407
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 10:00 am
Location: Orange NSW

Post by julian » Tue Jun 21, 2016 6:08 pm

I have both a Forester and Outback, both mid 2000s, both with 200,000km.
Both are good cars but I always choose the Outback if I have the choice. It is more comfortable, faster and has a much bigger load space.

It is also much quieter in terms of NVH which is very important to me on long trips. I would do up to six 1100km drives in a year all over a single day and I find the outback hands down the preferred car, even though it requires premium fuel for the 6 cylinder.

I do like the newer Foresters but these were way beyond my budget at the time.

Kid seats make a Forester seem very small.
Julian

2004 Outback H6
2004 Forester XS

Organ donation saves lives

User avatar
wrxpc
Junior Member
Posts: 21
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2012 1:37 pm
Location: WA

Post by wrxpc » Tue Jun 21, 2016 9:45 pm

Sorry for the thread hijack but I'm looking at upgrading from my L Series to an Outback.

Does anyone have any thoughts on the 2.5L four over the 3.0L six?

There seems to be very few manuals advertised - how good is the auto gearbox? I've only ever had manual cars but this will be my daily driver/kayak hauler/Bunnings runner, so being an auto wouldn't be a big deal.

Cheers,

Wrxpc

User avatar
taza
General Member
Posts: 1417
Joined: Sun Dec 26, 2010 10:21 pm
Location: Perth, Australia

Post by taza » Wed Jun 22, 2016 12:18 am

The 2.5's are still good mate. Ive had a few over the years.. both auto and manual. The manuals are much more powerful and do on average 100km to a tank more than the autos. The autos are smooth and reliable but really kill the performance of the 2.5.
Definately a good upgrade from an L.. ive had 7 of them with most begin great cars but under powered.

Post Reply

Return to “Subaru Chat”